The Silent Threat: Network Overload in an Emergency Operations Center

David Vazquez, Chief Resilience Officer/Director of Emergency Management, Clayton County Board of Commissioners

David Vázquez is the Chief Resilience Officer and Director of Emergency Management for Clayton County, Georgia. He leads emergency preparedness, disaster response, and resilience initiatives, ensuring community safety, infrastructure protection, and effective planning for sustainable and resilient county operations.

The Hidden Threat of Network Overload

When disaster strikes, the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) becomes the pulse of coordination and lifesaving decisions. It is where technology, personnel, and information converge to drive real-time response. Yet behind the activity and glowing dashboards lies a silent, often underestimated threat—network overload.

In today’s EOC, operational success is inseparable from digital connectivity. Weather monitoring, resource deployment, situational mapping, and public alerting all rely on a dependable network. Many agencies invest heavily in robust hardware and secure infrastructure, believing physical security equates to operational resilience. But even with strong equipment in place, EOCs remain vulnerable to a problem that can unfold quietly and rapidly: bandwidth saturation.

During high-tempo operations, the EOC fills not only with personnel, but with devices and data demands. During Georgia’s Winter Storm Cora and Winter Storm Enzo in 2025, each responder brought a workstation, applications, and a VoIP phone— multiplied across dozens of desks, large display walls, and coordination rooms. The network load surged, and what appeared to be a seamlessly engineered system quickly approached its limits.

Symptoms begin subtly—video feeds lag, calls drop, applications freeze—yet escalate with alarming speed. A GIS dashboard stops updating during damage assessments. Shared drives become inaccessible just as response plans or checklists are needed. Communications software slows or locks up entirely. These are not minor technical annoyances; they are operational hazards. They create the dreaded “Emergency within the Emergency.”

Real Consequences of Network Failure

The consequences can be severe. Imagine a major tornado barreling toward a densely populated area. The EOC is fully activated. The National Weather Service is issuing updates every few minutes. Dispatch is pushing siren activations and location data. Public information officers are monitoring social media, pushing alerts, and coordinating messaging. Hospitals, fire departments, police departments, and emergency management agencies are using shared platforms to coordinate in real time.

“In a world where minutes shape outcomes, the network is more than a technical asset, it is the lifeline of the entire response effort.”

Now imagine the network is already saturated.

Radar and spotter feeds stop updating. The decision to activate tornado sirens—normally made in seconds—is delayed because connectivity drops. A critical National Weather Service update is missed. Cloud-based alerting systems time out. Situational maps freeze, and field units cannot upload real-time damage reports. A single frozen feed cascades into widespread operational failures, affecting not just the EOC but the entire community depending on it.

The most sobering aspect of network overload is its invisibility. Agencies may not realize how close they are to failure until a major activation pushes their systems over the edge. The good news is that risk can be significantly reduced through awareness, planning, and strategic investment.

Strategies to Protect EOC Networks

EOCs should begin with comprehensive assessments of current network capacity. This includes analyzing peak bandwidth usage during exercises, full activations, and daily operations. Understanding demand patterns reveals weak points and helps anticipate future needs. Redundant pathways—both physical circuits and cloud-based backups—ensure smoother failover if one route becomes saturated.

Traffic prioritization is equally critical. Not all data is created equal during an emergency. Life-safety systems— public alerting platforms, GIS, dispatch feeds, and critical servers—must take precedence over nonessential traffic. Implementing quality-of-service protocols ensures that mission-critical functions remain stable even under stress.

Redundancy is another essential safeguard. Backup circuits, dedicated emergency bandwidth, and external systems such as Starlink offer alternate communication pathways. These diversified networks reduce single points of failure and maintain continuity if traditional infrastructure becomes overloaded or damaged. In rural or storm-impacted areas where terrestrial networks may fail, external satellite-based connectivity can be a crucial lifeline.

Regular testing is also vital. Exercises should intentionally stress the network, simulating highload conditions to expose vulnerabilities before a real emergency does. Staff training reinforces good digital discipline—limiting unnecessary streaming, large file transfers, or nonessential applications during activations.

Ultimately, protecting the network is about far more than IT resilience—it is about safeguarding lives. The EOC’s ability to gather information, analyze threats, coordinate responders, and issue warnings depends entirely on a stable digital backbone. Without it, even the best tools and most skilled personnel cannot operate effectively.

As emergencies grow more complex and more digitally dependent, the risk of network overload will only increase. Recognizing and addressing this silent threat may be one of the most important preparedness steps an emergency management agency can take.

In a world where minutes shape outcomes, the network is more than a technical asset. It is the lifeline of the entire response effort—and protecting it is essential.

GIS

Physical Security

VOIP