Monitoring in Prisons Using Artificial Intelligence
govciooutlookeurope

Monitoring in Prisons Using Artificial Intelligence

Government CIO Outlook | Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Legislators should be cautious when expanding the use of artificial intelligence, given its shortcomings.

FREMONT, CA: As artificial intelligence (AI) has become more powerful and accessible, governments have become increasingly interested in its potential benefits. A fiercely contested application of AI is monitoring talks between inmates and outside callers within jails and correctional facilities to identify specific words or phrases that may indicate danger for inmates.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Reuters reported that a group of congressional lawmakers made a request to the Department of Justice requesting a report on the potential use of AI in federal prisons, indicating that lawmakers may be receptive to the concept of implementing this technology on a wide scale. Reuters' David Sherfinski and Avi Asher-Schapiro wrote:

A crucial House of Representatives panel has requested a report on using AI to analyze prisoners' phone calls, paving the way for prisons in the United States to receive more technological assistance in monitoring inmate speech.

Families and advocates for prisoners argue that depending on AI to interpret messages leaves the system vulnerable to errors, misunderstandings, and racial bias.

The request for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to further investigate the technology to help prevent violent crime and suicide is included in an $81 billion-plus budget package for the DOJ and other federal agencies in 2022 that was approved by the Appropriations Committee last month.

The device can automatically transcribe inmates' phone calls by studying their communication patterns and detecting specific words or phrases, including slang, that are pre-programmed into the system by officials.

In an emailed statement, a Democratic staffer to the House of Representatives urged the Department of Justice to "consult with stakeholders while considering the viability of employing such a system."

Several state and local facilities around the nation, including Alabama, Georgia, and New York, have already begun implementing the technology.

Current problems with AI in prisons indicate early efforts to adopt the software may offer more risks than benefits. Comparing talks is hampered by the limited data available to the software in the current state of AI call monitoring. Developers focused on popular languages and dialects in the early days of analyzing language with AI. As a result, contemporary AI that investigates conversations struggles to comprehend some communication formats more than others.

This aspect of contemporary AI becomes troublesome when its usage in the criminal justice system is considered. Although most Americans speak English, there are over 30 primary varieties of American English. Currently, a significant proportion of inmates in American prisons do not talk about the kind of English that many developers train AI systems to recognize. According to research, AI constantly misinterprets African American English (AAE) compared to other dialects. According to a new study by Stanford Engineering, the technology that drives the nation's premier automatic speech recognition systems makes twice as many mistakes when interpreting words uttered by African Americans than when interpreting the exact words spoken by whites.

As a result, the use of AI in its current form may unwittingly discriminate against certain persons by flagging more of their discussions for human review than others. Consequently, utilizing AI in prisons before the technology can accurately catalog all offenders' languages would undoubtedly cause issues for populations already subject to discrimination.

The second obstacle to growing the use of AI in correctional facilities is not the technology's limitations but rather the extent to which management should rely on AI for effective oversight. AI can assist personnel in doing jobs more efficiently; nonetheless, correctional institution administrators should avoid responding to present challenges by depending excessively on AI in jail management. When the AI flags a communication, there must be a legitimate review and appeal process; it cannot be assumed that the AI system is always correct.

The labor-saving potential of AI has already attracted the attention of correctional administrators across the nation. As in other industries, technology has brought significant advancements to the field of corrections, but an over-dependence on new surveillance methods for convicts might have harmful effects. Instead of providing enough accommodations for convicts with COVID-19, New Orleans invested $70 million in technologically advanced camera upgrades.

Even if callers know that AI software is on the line, failure to physically supervise external calls may pose safety risks for inmates. Even if AI were capable of comprehending all inmates' calls, it is possible that some convicts would attempt to mislead the program, just as some inmates attempt to smuggle contraband into institutions or continue outside criminal operations while confined. Suppose officials opt to rely solely on AI to monitor phone calls. In that case, convicts might easily use codewords or other methods to circumvent AI software, making it easier for them to plot risky activities that could endanger inmates and cops. On the other hand, AI that incorrectly identifies innocent terms as problematic may result in unjust punishment of inmates.

However, policymakers should not overreact by concluding that the technology should be outlawed due to the genuine flaws of AI as it exists today. Researchers are already addressing some practical challenges associated with deploying AI to monitor prisoner discussions. If AI reaches the level of sophistication required to monitor prisoner discussions successfully and corrections staff accept it as a tool rather than a replacement, the technology might be revolutionary.

Additionally, a complete ban on the use of AI in jails would prevent prisoners from benefiting in the future from this technology. In a population where at least half of individuals are mentally ill and where present prisons only raise the likelihood of acquiring mental illness and further behavioral difficulties, we should pursue technologies that allow us to enhance the health of prisoners across the nation.

Before permitting expansions of AI's use, legislators should be cautious of the technology's existing flaws, but they must also avoid prematurely limiting this technology's future life-saving potential.

More in News

In an era marked by demands for greater transparency and accountability, public trust has become the most crucial asset for law enforcement, fire, and emergency services agencies. This emphasis on trust has led to a significant change in how these agencies select and manage their personnel. The traditional background check, which is often a static and one-time process, is being replaced by a more dynamic, holistic, and continuous vetting model. This transition is not simply an improvement of existing processes; it reflects a new philosophy that views vetting as an ongoing commitment to excellence, wellness, and public confidence rather than a single obstacle to overcome. The Evolution of Pre-Employment Vetting Pre-employment vetting has evolved far beyond a simple “go/no-go” decision based on criminal history. Modern agencies now seek candidates who not only meet basic qualifications but also demonstrate critical competencies such as emotional intelligence, resilience, cultural awareness, and sound judgment under pressure. This shift reflects a broader understanding that success in public service requires not only integrity but also the ability to navigate complex human and social dynamics effectively. A key development in this evolution is the rise of digital background checks, which employ advanced analytics to evaluate a candidate’s publicly available online activity. Using technologies such as natural language processing (NLP) and image analysis, agencies can systematically review social media posts, forums, and other digital interactions to identify indicators of bias, extremism, or poor judgment. This process creates a comprehensive view of a candidate’s character and alignment with the values expected of public servants. Complementing this, psychological screening has also modernized—incorporating psychometric tools and scenario-based assessments that measure emotional regulation, decision-making, and empathy in realistic, high-pressure environments. These tools enable agencies to identify not only potential risks but also positive traits that predict long-term effectiveness and stability in demanding roles. Comprehensive data aggregation has transformed background investigations into a holistic process. Integrated platforms now consolidate data from criminal, financial, and civil records, as well as national and international watchlists, allowing agencies to detect behavioral patterns that might previously have gone unnoticed. By connecting disparate data points—such as financial instability or repeated minor infractions—investigators can gain deeper insights into a candidate’s reliability and judgment. This unified, data-driven approach enables agencies to make more informed hiring decisions that balance risk mitigation with the proactive identification of individuals who embody the highest standards of public service. The Rise of Post-Employment Vetting One of the most transformative developments in public safety is the growing recognition that vetting does not conclude at the time of hire. The demanding nature of public safety work can influence behavior over time, and even well-intentioned individuals may make poor decisions long after passing their initial screening. This understanding has led to the emergence of continuous evaluation, also known as post-employment vetting—an ongoing process designed to ensure accountability and integrity throughout an employee’s tenure. Increasingly, agencies are implementing systems that deliver daily, automated alerts on personnel activities by monitoring a broad range of data sources, including criminal booking records, court filings, motor vehicle databases, and other public information streams. For example, suppose an officer is arrested in another jurisdiction over the weekend. In that case, agency leadership is notified immediately rather than discovering the issue months later during a scheduled review or through media coverage. This timely awareness allows organizations to take swift administrative or supportive action, reducing potential risks and reinforcing public trust. Continuous monitoring now extends into the digital sphere, identifying public-facing social media content that may violate departmental policies or damage the agency’s reputation. Beyond simple misconduct alerts, modern continuous vetting incorporates data-driven Early Warning Systems (EWS) designed to be preventative and supportive rather than punitive. These systems analyze internal data sources—such as use-of-force reports, citizen complaints, internal affairs records, dispatch logs, and attendance data—to detect emerging behavioral trends. For instance, an officer exhibiting a sudden increase in citizen complaints and use-of-force incidents may be flagged for supervisory review, even if each incident individually complies with policy. Such early identification functions as a “check engine light” for personnel, signaling potential issues such as burnout, stress, or training gaps. This enables non-disciplinary interventions, including wellness referrals, mentorship, or additional training, before performance declines or misconduct occurs. The Technological Engine of Modernization The transformation of public safety vetting is being driven by powerful technological platforms that serve as the foundation for modern workforce management. Secure, cloud-based systems now oversee every stage of an officer’s career—from recruitment to retirement—while artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enhance accuracy and insight. AI enables the rapid analysis of extensive digital footprints, while ML powers early warning systems (EWS) that learn from agency-specific data to detect behavioral anomalies. These platforms also excel at data integration, breaking down long-standing silos between Human Resources, Internal Affairs, Training, and Operations to create a unified, 360-degree view of each employee. This shift represents a move from static background checks to dynamic, real-time monitoring—a transition from a “snapshot” to a “streaming video” of an officer’s professional journey. The goal has evolved beyond simply filtering out unsuitable candidates; it now focuses on identifying, supporting, and developing the most capable individuals while enabling proactive interventions when needed. By combining data, analytics, and a philosophy of continuous assurance, public safety agencies are laying the groundwork for a more transparent, accountable, and resilient workforce—ultimately rebuilding and sustaining public trust for the future. The lifecycle of accountability in law enforcement hiring provides agencies with a mechanism to demonstrate, every single day, their unyielding commitment to the community. By establishing a culture of perpetual assurance, public safety organizations are not just restoring trust; they are building a future workforce that is inherently more transparent, effective, and worthy of the public’s faith. ...Read more
Government consulting plays a crucial role in shaping governance in the modern Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. As governments face complex challenges like rapid urbanization, climate change, and digital transformation, they increasingly turn to external consultants for expertise. These consultants assist them in navigating these issues and promoting sustainable development. Government consulting in the region is pivotal in advancing policy formulation, digital transformation, infrastructure development, public-private partnerships, and capacity building. Consultants contribute to policy formulation and implementation by leveraging advanced analytics and data science to support evidence-based decision-making. They conduct comprehensive impact assessments to understand potential social, economic, and environmental outcomes and work closely with government agencies to design and execute policies aligned with strategic objectives. In digital transformation, consultants develop e-governance solutions that enhance service delivery and citizen engagement while bolstering cybersecurity to protect critical infrastructure. They also utilize data analytics and artificial intelligence to streamline government operations and optimize decision-making. Consultants are key players in infrastructure development. They conduct feasibility studies and project planning to assess viability and impact, offer financial modeling and risk assessment to guide investment decisions and manage project execution to meet budget, timeline, and quality benchmarks. In public-private partnerships (PPPs), consultants assist governments in structuring and negotiating effective agreements that attract private investment. They identify and mitigate risks to safeguard public interests and monitor project performance to assess economic and social impacts. Capacity building is a cornerstone of government consulting in APAC. Consultants deliver training to enhance government officials' skills, support organizational development for greater efficiency, and facilitate knowledge transfer by sharing best practices and global insights, promoting a knowledge-driven approach to governance. Several pivotal trends will shape the future of government consulting in the APAC region. A heightened focus on sustainability will see consultants playing a crucial role in devising solutions for climate change, environmental protection, and promoting social equity. Technological advancements—such as AI, machine learning, and blockchain—are expected to transform government services and enhance decision-making processes. Increasingly, governments will seek collaborative partnerships, working closely with consulting firms, academic institutions, and the private sector to address complex challenges more effectively. Ethical considerations, particularly data privacy, cybersecurity, and social impact, will also become integral to consulting practices. As APAC continues to evolve, government consulting will play an increasingly vital role in shaping the region's future. By leveraging the expertise and insights of experienced consultants, governments can navigate complex challenges, achieve sustainable development goals, and build a brighter future for their citizens. ...Read more
Emergency management, or disaster management, is a systematic approach aimed at protecting communities by minimizing their vulnerability to both natural and man-made disasters. This process starts with prevention and involves emergency response teams throughout all phases of the emergency lifecycle: prevention, response, and post-emergency assessment. The focus is on developing plans and procedures that enable a quick and effective response. It ensures that the necessary resources, including trained personnel, equipment, and supplies, are readily available for prompt action. When an emergency happens, the emergency management team will take action. They will coordinate the response operations of all the different agencies and organizations involved, ensuring that everyone is working toward the same goal of safeguarding lives and property. With expertise in both natural and man-made disasters,  emergency management companies play a vital role in public safety. The Impact of Emergency Management on Public Safety: The primary objective of emergency management is to effectively prepare for and address emergencies. This encompasses natural calamities like hurricanes and wildfires, as well as terrorist attacks and other large-scale emergencies. It is crucial to remember that emergency management isn't just for organizations; it also applies to individuals. In any form of emergency, having a strategy in place will help people know what to do. In general, emergency management aims to keep people safe while minimizing harm caused by emergencies. This encompasses anything from organizing rescue attempts and providing emergency services to guaranteeing vital infrastructure security. Examples of Emergency Situations: Examples of emergency management range from natural disasters like hurricanes and floods to man-made disasters like chemical spills and nuclear accidents. Natural hazards are not only unforeseen but also unavoidable. In these cases, the emergency management team must confirm that everyone is safe and that the region is secure before allowing individuals to return home. Natural disasters include earthquakes, thunderstorms, floods, hurricanes, and volcanic eruptions. Suppose a security breach occurs at an establishment, for example. In that case, the emergency management team will be in charge of ensuring that all people within are safe and that the situation is under control. Robberies, kidnappings, and active shootings are some examples of security breaches. In the event of a medical emergency, the emergency management team would collaborate to ensure that patients receive appropriate care and that the hospital runs smoothly. Stroke, chest pain, serious head damage, and excessive bleeding are some of the most common situations classified under this category. ...Read more
Artificial intelligence (AI) can significantly enhance national emergency preparedness and response systems. By leveraging generative AI, organizations can improve information access, refine decision-making processes, and establish more efficient early warning systems. The technology enables diverse applications, including real-time data analysis, scenario simulations, and sentiment analysis, all designed to simplify complex information management. AI's versatility presents valuable opportunities for bolstering disaster relief efforts and facilitating real-time analysis in critical situations. ●  Early Warning Systems and Sentiment Analysis: Generative AI is a powerful tool for early warning systems and sentiment analysis, enabling connections between disparate systems. It can provide accurate warnings, analyze public sentiment, detect bad actors, identify misinformation, and tailor communications for precise information dissemination, making it a valuable tool for leaders. ●  Scenario Simulations: Generative AI can improve catastrophe modeling for better crisis assessment and resource allocation by creating simulations for emergency planners using historical data like location, community impact, and financial consequences. These simulators often perform tasks that exceed human capacity, such as finding flooded or unusable roads after a hurricane. ●  Real-Time Coaching and Training: Generative AI can aid in training responders and reducing surge costs during large disasters. It can listen to government call center conversations, prompt staff to provide contextually relevant information and provide instructions for new practitioners on various topics, thereby reducing the workload of disaster survivors. ●  Support Community Goodwill Efforts: Generative AI can provide real-time information, basic first aid, and health knowledge to affected communities during crises. It can help locate impacted areas and disseminate health and safety knowledge, enhancing community goodwill during preparation, response, and rebuilding. ●  Decision Support Systems: AI-powered systems can analyze data during crises to provide informed recommendations on evacuation, resource allocation, and community engagement. With real-time weather data, population characteristics, and infrastructure statistics, they can assist individuals displaced by disasters by suggesting shelter, resources, and personalized communication channels. ●  Post-Crisis Analysis: Generative AI can enhance emergency management by assessing response effectiveness, resource allocation, and evacuation plans, enabling leaders to improve future crisis management strategies. Emergency managers view disasters as recurring events with four phases: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Gen AI can accelerate preparedness and recovery by providing real-time coaching, decision support, and administrative functions, enabling quicker and more resilient community recovery in complex emergencies. ...Read more

Weekly Brief